Types of Mental Health professionals

Motivational Interviewing and CBT for Substance Misuse

I worked in a Substance Misuse service for 6 months, using mainly motivational interviewing and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. This is an example case to illustrate the approach we used. I have shared it with the clients consent and all details have been anonymised.

A homeless man came to the Substance Misuse Service for assessment. He reported struggling with alcohol use, depression and suicidal thoughts.

I completed the assessment, which took about an hour. We discussed why he’d come in, his substance misuse amounts and frequency, previous convictions, social issues and housing, family (especially details of any children who may be at risk), mental health, physical health, prescribed medication, etc. It also involved completing a risk assessment (eg risk of self neglect, suicide, harm to others, etc) and an initial care plan.

It was important to use Motivational Interviewing skills to during this assessment to encourage change. I’ll explain this in more detail later.

At the end of the assessment, he was asked to complete a urine drug screen and breathalyser.

His assessment indicated that he was physically dependent on alcohol. This means that if he stopped suddenly then he would be at risk of having a seizure (and in some cases people have died from this). I therefore advised him to keep drinking, especially if he was starting to experience shakes, and that he would have to reduce the alcohol gradually (generally by 10% every couple of days).

I discussed his assessment with the rest of the multi-disciplinary team (nurses, psychiatrists, social workers, occupational therapists and psychologists) at the allocation meeting. The client was assigned to the alcohol drop in service; this meant that he would come in once a week during drop in hours for motivational interviewing. After a couple of weeks I was then assigned as his keyworker and continued to work with him on a one-to-one basis.

The aim of Motivational Interviewing was to develop a discrepancy between the person’s current situation and where they want to be. By heightening their ambivalence you can encourage change.

One technique I used is the decisional matrix. This involved asking the client to identify the advantages of staying the same, the disadvantages of staying the same, the disadvantages of changing and the advantages of changing. It was helpful for the client to see that there were many more positives to changing, compared to staying the same.

Another technique was to ask the client to rate their current physical/mental health on a numerical scale and then ask them what it would take to increase that rating by 1 or 2 points. This encouraged the client to think of ways of changing. By coming up with the suggestions himself, he was more likely to accept them compared to being told by someone else. For example, he is more likely to accept his own suggestion ‘I guess I would feel better if I quit smoking’ compared to me saying ‘you should quit smoking’.

It was also important to use the elicit-provide-elicit technique when providing information in to avoid resistance. This is where you ask the person what they know about a topic, then ask permission to give them a bit more information about it, then afterwards elicit it again by asking them how they understand what you’ve just told them.

Throughout the session I used summaries to emphasised the reasons he had given me for wanting to change and encourage ‘change talk’. I also used reflections to manage any resistance. For example, when he stated ‘my family keep nagging me about my drinking’, I reframed it by reflecting ‘so you’re family care about you a lot and are concerned about you’. Or when he stated ‘I’ve tried treatment before and it hasn’t worked’, I reframed it as ‘you’re persistent because it means a lot to you’. You can also used amplified reflections, for example if a client stated ‘I don’t want to give up methadone’, you could amplify it by reflecting ‘so you want to stay on methadone for the rest of your life’, in order to get them to acknowledge ‘well, no I guess not’.

Through Motivational Interviewing I was able to support the client to gradually reduce his alcohol use, to the point where we were able to put him on the waiting list for a detox. I explained that the Detox was the easy part and the hard part would be remaining abstinent when he comes back out again, back to the same situations, places and people. It was therefore important to have some Relapse Management sessions (based on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) before the Detox.

The Relapse Management sessions involved using Socratic dialogue; informational questioning, active listening (using reflections), summaries and analytical questioning. In analytical questioning you ask questions that will help the client come up with the answers themselves eg ‘on the one hand you say that you think alcohol will help but on the other hand you say that you feel depressed afterwards; how do you make sense of that?’ will lead the client to realise ‘I guess it actually doesn’t help’.

We also focused on identifying and adjusting his automatic thoughts, underlying assumptions and core beliefs (see previous blogs on CBT for an explanation of this). I explained to him that his thoughts and evaluative judgements mediate between stimuli and his emotions or behavioural response. It is not the event that makes him feel depressed but his evaluation of the event; for example, thinking that not being able to get him a job makes him a failure.

He was repeatedly asked to rate on continuum scales (see previous blog) and keep a positive data log as homework. We looked at goal setting and problems solving as well as how to manage high risk situation (eg if in situations with alcohol present), crisis plans (for what to do and who to contact if at risk of drinking) and lapse chains (to determine factors contributing to any lapses he has). I also explained to him the difference between lapses (one or two instances of previous behaviour) versus relapses (going completely back to the previous behaviour) and explained that lapses don’t have to lead to relapse.

Along with the one-to-one therapy sessions, I was responsible for completing continual risk assessments, focusing on the suicidal thoughts and any protective factors. I assessed if they were constant or fleeting and whether he had any intent or plans.

I was also responsible for helping him find housing by writing a letter to the council, helping him find employment by referring him to our employment specialist and liaising social services regarding his daughter. We always inform social services if a child is involved. I explained to him that, although many people worry about social services finding out, they will actually see the engagement in treatment as a good sign because you are getting help. They will always work with families to try and help them and only take children away as a last resort.

I also encouraged him to join in with the service’s groups, including the gardening group, so that he could meet other people in recovery and start engaging in pleasurable activities again (people with depression often cut these activities out of their life over time).

After a successful Detox, he went to rehab. When I left the service he had been sober for 3 months, had improved mood, no suicidal thoughts, had found housing and was completing training (to improve the likelihood of employment). I was glad that I was able to see the case through, as often I have to leave the placement half way through working with someone. It was rewarding to see how far he’d come.

Quick overview of Motivational Interviewing

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a therapeutic technique that healthcare professionals can use when supporting clients to make changes in their life. This can include doctors supporting patients to stop smoking or psychologists helping clients to engage in therapy. The approach involves exploring and heightening ambivalence about change to help the client move forwards.

The Spirit of MI:

Motivational interviewing is a collaborative approach where the professional honours the client’s autonomy. They are there to guide the client rather than directing or following them. They never tell the client what to do unless specifically asked for your suggestions.

Providing information using the Elicit Provide Elicit sequence:

If you lecture someone about the changes that they need to make, they probably won’t listen. They will probably just shut down or start arguing with you.

It’s much more effective to first check what they know about the topic (Elicit), so that you can be sure that you are only providing them with new information, and ask their permission to tell them more, so they have agreed to listen before you start talking.

When giving advice (Provide), you should keep it neutral, accurate and brief, for example stating ‘you might consider….’ or ‘other people have found that…’.

After giving them information, you can then ask them what they think about this or if they can summarise it back to you (Elicit) . This is to ensure that they have properly understood what you’ve said.

This whole process is know as the ‘Elicit Provide Elicit’ sequence and it tends to be very effective:

Elicit: Checking what they know.
Provide: Give neutral information with permission.
Elicit : Checking what they’ve understood.

 The 4 underlying principles:

 1.    Express empathy through Reflections and Summaries:

Reflections: The professional will often repeat, rephrase or paraphrase what the person has said back to them to show that they have understood. It’s especially important to reflect any ‘change talk’, which is where the person expresses the Desire to change, Ability to change, Reasons to change, Need to change or Commitment to change (DARN-C); reflecting change talk will encourage them to talk about this more.

Summarise: The professional will also summarise what the client has said as a way to encourage them to talk about certain parts more and also to check they have understood correctly. They will also ask the client ‘Is there anything I have missed?’ as part of checking the therapeutic alliance.

 2.    Developing the discrepancy between the current situation and their desired situation:

Developing a discrepancy between the current situation and the desired situation often helps motivate the person to start making changes. For example, ‘I have health problems, no partner and little money as a result of smoking’ vs ‘I want to be able to start running again, find a partner and save up money for a house’. Clients may even be asked to draw out two potential futures: one future where they managed to make changes and one future where they continued with their current behaviour.

Professionals can also use ratings and decisional matrix to help develop discrepancy:

Developing Discrepancy using ratings:
They might ask the client to rate the current situation (eg their physical health) on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the worst it could be and 10 being the best it could be.
They would then ask ‘what would have to happen for the rating to be increased by 1-2 points?’ This encourages the client to generate ideas about small steps they can take towards their goal. It is always more effective for the client to hear themselves say it, rather than hearing it as a suggestion from someone else. They are less likely to be resistant to their own suggestions.

Exploring ambivalence using a decisional matrix:

Clients may also be supported to complete a ‘decisional matrix’, which is a 2×2 grid where they consider both the pros and cons of making the change and the pros and cons of continuing with the current behaviours. The client is supported to not only look at the number of pros and cons in each section, but also consider the weighting of each item; for example, there may be 10 cons, but they may all be outweighed by 2 more significant pros. This exercise also gives clients the opportunity to openly discuss the barriers to making changes eg they might get less support from their family if they start to recover.

3.    Avoid confrontation and roll with resistance rather that opposing it directly

Resistance can include disagreeing, discounting, interrupting, sidetracking, unwillingness, blaming, arguing, challenging, minimizing, pessimism, excusing or ignoring. When clients respond with resistance, its usually a signal that the professional should adjust their approach. They should avoid arguing for change or responding direct opposition and ensure that new perspectives are being invited but not imposed.

The client is the primary resource in finding solutions, so the professional will prompt them with questions like:

‘What do you think is the first step?’
What do you think you will do?
Where do you go from here?
What are your options?
How are you going to do it?
How will things be better for you when you change?
‘How would your life be different if you achieved this goal?’
Suggest with permission SMART goals.

4.  Support self efficacy and optimism for change

The professional should model optimism and confidence in the client’s ability to change. They can also provide affirmations and praise when the client manages to take small steps towards change. Sometimes even turning up to the session can be a big step or sign of commitment. However, it’s important that any praise is tailored to the client’s presentation and personality, so that this does not come across as patronising.

I will add some worksheets and videos with more information about motivational interviewing soon.

An average day on an Eating Disorders Day Unit

8.45am: Clients arrive at the unit and have their weekly weighing.

9.00am: The clients and staff eat breakfast together. Each client’s meal plan is written together by the client and dietician. It is important that staff measure out juice/cereal/butter/etc accurately to ensure that each client gets the appropriate calorie intake. Clients are very aware if they have been given too much and this can cause conflict, especially as meals are generally a very stressful time. Staff try to distract clients by talking about other topics and not discussing the food, unless prompting is required.

9.30am: Post meal reflections in the lounge. Clients discuss how they found breakfast and any difficulties they experienced over the weekend. Clients are encouraged to stay for half an hour after breakfast, to avoid purging.

10.15am Psychological Skills session for clients to learn ways of managing their anxieties and issues associated with their eating disorder. There are also Health and Wellbeing, Self-esteem and Family/Systemic groups during the week. Some clients have individual or family sessions.

11.15am Snack time

11.25am Key working sessions and client reviews.

12.45pm Lunch time. This is generally more tense than breakfast as it is a bigger meal.

1.30pm Post Meal reflections

2.10pm Art therapy group. Clients are given the topic ‘Road to Recovery’ and allowed to use any media they want. They all really seem to enjoy the group and it’s interesting to see their interpretations (see photo).

3.30pm Snack time

3.45pm End of day reflections.

4.00pm Clients go home. Their evening meal is planned in advance.